Pages
Categories
- Commentary
- Interviews
- Motivation
- Nutrition
- Prehab / Rehab
- Product Review
- Research
- Research Review
- Training
- Uncategorized
Archives
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
My Newsletter
Sign up for my newsletter to be kept in the loop with the latest happenings at Mark Young Training Systems
Meta
Autor: markyoung
~ 23/02/09
Is it actually good for you?
Squatting is widely accepted as one of the greatest movements in strength training and, among those who are more versed in the iron game, it is also widely accepted that not squatting past parallel makes you a total ninny.
That is…until Eric Cressey wrote this article HERE.
In essence, what Eric was saying was that if you can’t squat past parallel without going into lumbar flexion that perhaps you should avoid it. Instead, it might be better for you to squat to a depth that prevents lumbar flexion (possibly by doing a box squat) and thereby reduce your injury risk.
In fact, the current thinking in the strength training community as a whole seems to be that loading the lumbar spine under flexion is a bad idea in any circumstance. The general consensus is that when the spine is flexed there is nothing to resist the anterior shear forces produced by the load and the risk of injury is high. I actually subscribe to this theory myself.
However, I recently stumbled across the little tidbit of information below that has given me pause. That is not to say that I’m sold on the idea or that I’ll be changing my methods any time soon, but it is important to keep an open mind. After all, you can pretty much find information to support whatever viewpoint you have. Reading information that is challenges your viewpoint is probably going to teach you more than the stuff that agrees with it.
While reading through Functional Anatomy of the Spine by Middleditch and Oliver I stumbled across this point:
“Posterior rotation of the pelvis causes an increase in flexion at the lumbosacral junction and hence increases tension in the thoracolumbar fascia. Lumbar spine flexion also passively increases tension in the thoracolumbar fascia. Competitive weightlifters may flex or ’round out’ the lumbosacral area and it is suggested that this affords some protection by increasing tension in the thoracolumbar fascia and posterior ligamentous structures, thereby contributing to stability in the low lumbar area.”
They even go so far as to say that this effect might help to reduce anterior shear forces produced by flexion.
Click the image for a larger version:
As I said earlier, I’m not totally sold on that idea and I’m definitely not about to start suggesting that you should squat with a flexed spine, but there is a point to take home. If the thoracolumbar fascia can contribute to spinal stability, then contracting the lats (which attach to the fascia) while squatting could theoretically pull the fascia taut and reduce anterior sheer.
Just some food for thought.
.
For a more great muscle and movement information make sure to check out Musle Imbalances Revealed.

Mark, this guy would certainly agree with the study you reference:
http://siliconvalleyfit.com/category/training-tips/page/2/
Comment by Dale Dykes — February 3, 2011 @ 11:37 PM
I think rounding of the area of the thoracolumbar facia is more of a result of tight hamstring muscles which in effect pulls the bottom of the pelvis and you get that little “tuck.” Thats why olympic weightlifting shoes have elevated heels. With proper hamstring, ankle, and achilles flexibility, it is possible to perform “ass to the grass” squats without rounding the lower back. Furthermore, I believe the NSCA did a study that showed less shearing force on the patellar region when performing full squats as compared to parallel squats. Not only that, but hamstring, quadriceps muscle imbalance is enhanced when only doing parallel squats. The hip extensors have to do the majority of the work to get up and through parallel which promotes proper muscle balance.
Comment by max — June 30, 2011 @ 1:06 PM