Pages
Categories
- Commentary
- Interviews
- Motivation
- Nutrition
- Prehab / Rehab
- Product Review
- Research
- Research Review
- Training
- Uncategorized
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
My Newsletter
Sign up for my newsletter to be kept in the loop with the latest happenings at Mark Young Training Systems
Meta
Autor: markyoung
~ 08/06/09
Recently the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) published an article on the use of unstable surface training.
Here are a few excerpts that may be of interest:
“Instability resistance exercises induce high muscle activation of postural limb and trunk muscles. The increased activation has been attributed to the increased stabilization functions. Instability resistance training with its high muscle activation and lower external stress on joints could also be beneficial for general musculoskeletal health and certain types of rehabilitation.”
“Unstable conditions can lead to decreased force and power output, decreased range of motion and velocity. Furthermore ground based weight training exercises such as squats and dead lifts can provide equal or greater trunk activation than using instability devices. Another study has also reported that highly trained individuals do not experience greater trunk activation when performing exercises under light or moderately unstable conditions.”

“Since many of the benefits of instability devices can be achieved with high resistance involving ground based free weights, advanced resistance trained individuals may not need to emphasize this type of training in their strength and power training programs.”
“The benefits of instability resistance training may be more pronounced for those individuals pursuing primarily general health and rehabilitation benefits and not participating in training with free weights involving high loads.”
So what’s the bottom line?
While stability training might be beneficial for rehab or even general fitness (I might even contest this one), it probably isn’t a valuable tool for most lifters. For the definitive explanation of this type of training check out Eric Cressey’s book The Truth About Unstable Surface Training HERE.
Do you use unstable surfaces in your own training? Do you think stability training is useless? Feel free to post your thoughts and experiences in the comments section below.
This article makes perfect sense. If fitness is about being physical readiness for tasks that are thrown our way, then unstable surface training is completely useless. Thanks for posting this!
Comment by Alicia Reitz Doerr — June 9, 2009 @ 1:15 PM
Hello. SAID principle anyone? If the ground is shaking under you during your next athletic game, you have much bigger issues!
I’ve found (and I believe research from what I’ve read) supports that virtually all LOWER body unstable training is worthless, but upper body unstable training can have some benefit if used correctly. Matches the SAID principle applied to most athletes “normal” life movements.
Rock on
Mike T Nelson
PhD(c), CSCS, RKC, ZMT
Comment by Mike T Nelson — June 10, 2009 @ 3:30 PM
I actually wrote about this 3 years ago in my Chaos Training manual. Eric and I have spoken about this and I agree with everyone’s assessment.
Mike, you smart!
Comment by smitty — June 12, 2009 @ 8:00 PM
The problem I have with this research is that they use “activation” synonymously with “better”. As Mike alluded to, there is a gap in logic in applying this to real-world activity. Some may argue that the goal in sports/life is ultimately to minimize the amount of muscular activity to perform any given task, therefore minimizing energy expenditure. Just a thought!
Comment by Kevin Neeld — January 6, 2011 @ 5:02 PM
Great point Kevin!
Comment by markyoung — January 6, 2011 @ 6:11 PM