As many of you know, I’m a huge advocate of reading (or learning) for at least an hour per day.  Since my beautiful daughter was born almost 8 weeks ago she and I have been putting in our time reading and watching some great stuff.

Outliers - By Malcolm Gladwell

This book provides a very insightful look at what makes people successful in their respective fields.  Despite what you might think about working hard, Gladwell suggests that this is only part of the equation.  Although I’m not 100% sold on every single assertion that was made, it certainly was enough to open my eyes to the possibility that there are other factors at play.

More importantly, Gladwell’s writing style is interesting and easy to read which is refreshing if you’re looking for something thought provoking, but not overly intense.  If this isn’t enough to convince you, consider that I’m now reading another Gladwell book called The Tipping Point and have his other books Blink and What the Dog Saw on my bookshelf already.

Fast Food Nation - By Eric Schlosser

Honestly, I could probably tell you all about this book and how it explains the production, flavoring, and marketing of your food, but it really wouldn’t do justice to the vast amount of information that is covered about the effects of corporate power on our food supply.

Consider that companies like Nestle make baby formula (Gerber), food (Cheerios, Lean Cuisine, Stouffer’s), coffee (Nescafe), chocolate (Kit Kat, Smarties), and then when you get good and overweight they can sell you food replacements like Boost, Powerbar, Jenny Craig, and even the medically managed weight loss product called Optifast.  Need some water for that shake?  No worries, they sell that too.  Pure Life, Perrier, Vittel, and S.Pelligrino are all Nestle products.  And by the way, they are also feeding your pets.  Nestle makes Alpo, Friskies, and Fancy Feast.   Once they start making caskets they’ll have us covered from cradle to grave.

Imagine what would happen if the goverment tried to mandate changes to the foods we eat to make them healthier.  Imagine the power of corporations to resist.  Although the observations about Nestle are my own, I’m sure you get the idea.  Fast Food Nation is well worth the read.

Note that this book led me to investigate further the treatment of animals during the commercial production of the food we eat.  Check out the galleries on THIS SITE if you’re interested.  Consider this fair warning that the images there are graphic and disturbing.  They also are not intended to convey that I think all industry operates like this…but it certainly opens your eyes.

StrengthCoach.com

Recently I’ve spent a fair bit of time on Strength Coach.com and I really enjoy the content.  The weekly articles are great, but I have to admit that the forum is really where it is at.  

Unlike many other web forums that are chock-full of nonsense by written by any idiot with a keyboard, here you can often read and participate in discussions bright folks like Mike Boyle, Bret Contreras, Mike Robertson, Alwyn Cosgrove,  Nick Tumminello, Charlie Weingroff, and many others that I’m probably forgetting to name.

Personally, I’ve read some people’s responses in the advanced forum and had to look stuff up or ask questions just so I could understand what they’re talking about.  As a result I’ve learned a ton of new stuff in a short period of time.

I think this is an incredible resource and totally worth checking out.  It’ll cost you a buck to try it for 14 days and if you don’t like it you can bail.

Oh yeah…while I’m on the Mike Boyle front I should also mention that I just watched Functional Strength Coach Volume 3 and think this is a great resource for any up and coming coach.

Fat Is Not Your Fault

After interviewing Dr. Bryan Walsh a few weeks back I decided to check out his Fat is not Your Fault Program.  Frankly, I’ve grown a little tired of the overhyped rapid fat loss programs that are basically just some variation of a low carb diet which is why I think this program is so interesting.  Dr. Walsh not only emphasizes the importance of diet, exercise, and mindset, but he also identifies several other possible roadblocks to fat loss success that you’re not going to see in your typical fat loss program.

I’ve already read the manual and am currently about half way through watching the videos and am loving the information so far.  Never have I really given as much thought to adrenal health and gastrointestinal function as I have since seeing this product.  If you’re successfully navigating the fat loss world, I’m not sure you’re absolutely in need of this program, but if you or a client have ever had difficulty losing fat despite being totally on plan, this would be a worthwhile investment.  Personally, I’m thinking of making Dr. Walsh’s screening questionaire (which is included) as part of my battery of forms for my clients.

Z-Health R Phase Manual

At the persistent enouragement of Mike T Nelson I’m checking out the Z-Health system.  To be honest, I have yet to start reading/watching this, but it is next on my list so hopefully I’ll steal a few pearls of wisdom from this as well.

What great stuff are you reading right now?  What’s next on your reading list?  Drop me a comment and let me know.

Hey Mike!  Thanks for taking the time to drop some knowledge bombs on us today.  Obviously I’m already sold on your new product Assess and Correct, but why don’t you give the readers a little rundown on what exactly it is so we know just what we’re talking about here?

Thanks for having me, Mark!

I think Assess and Correct is a powerful tool, as it allows each client to go through over 25 assessments to determine what exactly their specific movement limitations are.

Beyond just telling you what’s tight, weak, stiff, etc., we build off that knowledge with specific corrective exercises to help address those issues!  So if your glutes test weak, we have developed specific exercises to help correct those issues.

And finally, we know and understand that everyone who purchases this product has different levels of dysfunction, so we’ve created progressions to work through instead of just pre-canning one or two exercises.  Quite simply, everyone from the weekend warrior to the elite-level athlete will be able to assess themselves and create a warm-up routine that addresses their specific needs, with an exercise routine that’s specific to their current level of fitness.

It seems that a growing segment of the fitness industry is already using The Functional Movement Screen.  What do you think is the major difference between this and Assess & Correct?

Damn Mark, are you trying to get me in trouble with Gray and Lee?  The last thing I need is a pipe-bomb sitting in my mailbox when I get home someday!

In all seriousness, I have great respect for what Lee and Gray have done with the FMS.  Quite simply, they’ve brought assessment to the forefront of the industry, and you have to applaud them for that.

I think with A&C, our goal has been to not only make the assessment more comprehensive, but more convenient as well.  The beauty of the FMS is its simplicity – seven tests and you’re done. However, you need to find someone with knowledge of the FMS to assess and score you.  

With A&C, there’s a little bit more work involved up front – you have to take static pictures of yourself, along with videotaping yourself perform the various assessments.  However, you can do everything yourself!  Without ever leaving your home, you can determine your specific movement limitations from head-to-toe, along with how to address them.
 

Obviously you don’t want to spend all day assessing people.  Do you think that anyone currently using the movement screen should switch to A&C?  If not, how could they combine the two resources to get the best possible assessment and treatment protocol for themselves or their clients?
 

I think it’s going to be hard to convert people over – many people like the FMS due to its ease of use, along with the fact that you can screen people fairly quickly.

Again, with A&C the biggest difference is it’s going to take more time, but it’s also more comprehensive.  Whether it’s with A&C or a new client at IFAST, I would always like to err on the side of more information, using a more comprehensive testing system, than not.

Could you combine the two products?  Sure.  However, I think on some levels that may be redundant, as we’re looking for a lot of the same issues. 

What do you know about Z-Health and what do you think about their mobility drills vs those in A&C?

I have the utmost respect for Dr. Cobb and his system.  The biggest issue with Z isn’t the system or the drills, but rather the “in-your-face” nature of some of their practitioners.

Even though I think A&C is a fantastic product, I never want to box myself into thinking there’s only one way to do things.  I’m only R-Phase certified in Z, so I can’t speak for the entire system, but I really liken some of the R-Phase drills to micro-mobility.  The goal is to really isolate out each individual joint to promote better movement.  I can definitely see value in this, and I think there’s as much value in the improvements you’d see in motor control/body awareness as there is in the improved mobility.

To summarize, I think A&C would be superior to the end-user in the fact that you have a specific idea of your limitations and what you need to address when it’s all said and done.  Unless you meet with a Z-Health trainer for an assessment, you can’t do this with the current DVD’s and manuals they have available.

I’ve recently heard a lot of people suggesting that the fitness industry has become too much about mobility and activation these days and too little about just getting strong and sexy.  Are we spending too much time on “corrective movements”?  And how do you think mobility work and activation fit into the bigger picture?

I think it all depends on who you’re reading and listening to!

I’ve heard both sides argued lately – some say we’re too caught up in “fixing” things, and others who say we still aren’t good enough at it yet.

I think many of the corrective naysayers are minimalists at heart, and I can understand that to a degree.  However, when you start digging into the research, there’s actual evidence that often it’s not just the strength of a muscle that’s important, but your neuromuscular/motor control.  In other words, who cares if it’s strong if you can’t use it!

This is where that whole mindset goes – I don’t care if you want to lose fat, add muscle, get strong or perform at a high-level.  I want to help you get there, but I also see the big picture.  If I assess you up front and notice specific movement limitations, why would I not address them?

Why would I assume that I can train around them, or somehow magically make them disappear?

This is the “corrective” mindset – to assess limitations and correct them via training.  This could include foam rolling, mobility work, or even the dreaded activation work.  The part you have to focus on, however, is that this is just part of the programming – not all of it.  It’s all pieces to the puzzle.

At the risk of sounding arrogant, Bill and I get some really beat up people at our gym.  Same thing goes for Eric.  I think between the three of us, we have a pretty good idea of what works and what doesn’t.  If foam rolling, mobility, or activation drills didn’t work, we wouldn’t use them.  Period.
 

And finally, a little word association:
 

Squats – Fantastic, when performed and programmed appropriately.  And we use all types: Plate, front, back, safety bar, to a box, free squat, pause squats, full ROM, limited ROM, etc. 
 

Beer – My favorite calorie-laden beverage.  Ever since my Australia trip I’ve been hooked on Heineken, but only because I can’t get my hands on Victoria’s Bitter (VB’s) around here!
 

Crunches – A horrible exercise that not only wrecks backs, but wrecks posture as well.  If your goal is neutral spine and a healthy back, crunches shouldn’t be in your vocabulary, let alone your program.
 

Fat Loss – The “new” hot topic.  Fat loss is always going to be at the fore-front of the fitness industry, but I’m fed-up with fitness marketing.  Fat loss promotions tend to be the worst.
 

Twitter – Not sure on this one.  I can see where some people would really enjoy it, but I guess I’m not that interested in talking about myself all day.  Plus, I’m more of a Facebook whore than a Twitter whore.  What can I say, I’m old-school!
 

That Mark Young clown – A great up-and-coming coach, with a balanced view on training.  I love the fact that you’re willing to read and/or listen to anything, even if it’s out of your comfort zone.  That’s what will make you successful.
 

Thanks Mike for the interview.  Where can people learn more about you or pick up a copy of Assess & Correct?
 

Thanks for having me Mark!  Sorry if I tend to ramble a bit, but your questions got me fired up!

My blog, newsletter, articles and Podcast can all be found at RobertsonTrainingSystems.com.  If you’re interested in picking up a copy of Assess and Correct, check out the Assess and Correct Website.  There you’ll find testimonials from other coaches, more info about the product, as well as video clips directly from the video so you can see how things work.

Today I have the distinct pleasure of posting an audio interview I did recently with Mike T Nelson.

Mike is a PhD candidate in Kinesiology at the University of Minnesota.  He is also a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS) by the NSCA, Z Health R, I, S and T Phase certified, Z Health Master Trainer, and a RKC (Russian Kettlebell Certification).

Oh yeah, He is a professional member of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM),  the North American Society of Pediatric Exercise Medicine (NASPEM) and has presented at both ACSM and NASPEM Conferences as well.

In other words, Mike is wicked smart!

We chatted about the power of the nervous system, neuroplasticity, working the opposite joint for better strength, arthrokinetic reflex (bad joints = piss poor strength),  how the brain gets information for performance (hint, think joints, eyes and inner ear), Z-Health and much more!

You don’t want to miss this.  

Click here to listen!

In the meantime, feel free to drop by Mike’s site as well.  He’s giving away one hundred dollars to each of the first 100 visitors.  Okay…just kidding.  Here’s the link:

www.extremehumanperformance.com

In my head I can often here my grad school statistics professor saying “68 percent of the population fall within one standard deviation from the mean”.  What this means, besides the fact that I’m a total geek, is that whenever there is an average response to something (such as a training program) this only applies directly to approximately 70% of the people you use it on.

That is not to say that it won’t work at all on the others, but that it has the greatest chance of success with the majority that fall closest to the average.  The further you are away from the average the less likely the plan is to work on you.

Of course, this assumes a normal bell curve and, without getting into too much statistics, I can tell you than not every physiological phenomenon occurs like that.  Sometimes the results are skewed more to one side or the other meaning that a lot more people or less people are responsive to a certain program.

And finally there are people that scientists like to call “outliers”.  You can see in the picture above that these are people who don’t fit the rest of the data.  They stand out by themselves and their results are not typical of the rest of people being tested.  These are the people that scientists like to remove from the data because they make statistical analysis more difficult.  However, these are the people who are more likely to respond to a specific plan that may not work for everyone else.  On the flip side, they are also less likely to respond to the program that does work for everyone else.

My main point here is that everyone in the fitness industry has their philosophy.  For nutrition some people like to tell you to eat for your blood type, others will tell you to eat based on your ethnic background, and some will tell you to eat based on your skin caliper measures.  Still, others will tell you just to eat the same thing as everyone else they train because they don’t know any other way.

High Suprailiac Skinfold - "Low carbs for you tubby!"

With training some people will design your program based on fiber type, others will base it on a Functional Movement Screen, Z Health, or other type screen.  And some will exclusively use kettlebells, strongman equipment, other implements in their program design.

As an intelligent trainee or coach I agree that it is important to have a base philosophy to work from.  This will provide a starting point for yourself or your clients.  However, even more important is not being too attached to your program or your ego to let it go when it possibly isn’t the best plan for up to 30% of the population.

No matter how much science you have backing up your program, it doesn’t mean squat if you’re not getting results.  Ultimately this leaves me with two take home points.

1.  Measure your progress.

If you’re not measuring your progress you don’t know if you’re moving forward, backwards, or staying the same.  Of course, this assumes that you already you have specific and measurable goals to work towards, but you already knew that because you’re too smart to be training with no goals…aren’t you?

2.  Use Results Based Programming

If you (or your clients) are not moving towards your goals then you need to revise your system.  You need to look at your previous measures of results to find out what brought the biggest gains.  This means looking back at your training and nutrition logs (you have these too right?) and seeing what worked.

*As a side note to trainers and coaches, this is also the point for you to evaluate YOUR system.  Have you been pursuing one system for a long time to the exclusion of all others.  Maybe it is time to look at something else for a while.  Don’t worry…your system will still be there when you get back.  The more resistant you are to this idea, the more you probably need to follow the advice.*

In the end, systems are great tools, but results are paramount.  Explore and read all you can about as many systems as you can and select the one the brings results for the specific person or situation.  Better yet, take elements of many systems and create your own.  No one system is perfect.  Except mine, of course.  Just kidding.

As many of you may know, I believe that reading for an hour per day is paramount if you hope to become a leader in any field.  Fitness and nutrition are no different.  Here are a few things to get you started for today.

Tennis Elbow Pain: Tendonosis vs Tendonitis

Great little blog by Mike T Nelson on using eccentric exercise to speed healing from tendon pain in the elbow/forearm.

Are Tennis Elbow Straps Effective?

Short post by Mike Reinhold detailing the effectiveness of elbow straps for decreasing pain caused by tennis elbow.